Abbott i-Stat PT/INR Cartridge 의 리콜

New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority에 따르면, 해당 리콜 는 New Zealand 에서 Abbott Point of Care Canada Ltd 에 의해 제조된 제품과 관련되어 있습니다.

이것은 무엇인가요?

의료기기에 문제가 생겼을 경우 제조사가 이를 바로잡거나 시장에서 회수하는 조치를 말한다. 회수(Recall)는 의료기기에 결함이 있거나, 건강에 위협이 되거나, 또는 결함도 있고 건강에도 위협이 될 경우에 발생한다.

데이터에 대해 더 자세히 알아보기 여기
  • 사례 유형
    Recall
  • 사례 ID
    15617
  • 사례 시작날짜
    2013-11-05
  • 사례 국가
  • 사례 출처
    NZMMDSA
  • 사례 출처 URL
  • 비고 / 경고
    Data from New Zealand is current through July 2018. All of the data comes from the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, except for the categories Manufacturer Parent Company and Product Classification.
    The Parent Company and the Product Classification were added by ICIJ.
    The parent company information is based on 2017 public records. The device classification information comes from FDA’s Product Classification by Review Panel, based on matches of recall data from the U.S. and New Zealand.
  • 데이터 추가 비고
    Recalling Organisation: Abbott Laboratories (NZ) Ltd, Ground Floor, Building D, 4 Pacific Rise, Mt Wellington, Auckland
  • 원인
    The manufacturer has determined that a range of i-stat pt/inr cartridge lots have the potential to exhibit incorrectly elevated results. internal studies have demonstrated that i-stat pt/inr results are eleveated by an average of approxiamtely 10% as compated to the international reference preparation (rtf/09) in the therapeutic range of 1.8 to 3.0 inr.
  • 조치
    Product to be destroyed

Device

Manufacturer

  • 제조사 모회사 (2017)
  • 제조사 의견
    “We are in constant communication with regulatory agencies and competent authorities worldwide which allows us to implement global recalls or in-country communication quickly and effectively,” Abbott, which now owns St. Jude Medical told ICIJ in a statement. In addition to sending global notices to physicians worldwide, we also make sure that product advisories are available online and classification of product recalls and product advisories are determined by global regulatory bodies which can impact the timing in any given country. MD companies follow varying regulations in different countries. In come countries software is not regulated so a recall in one country related to software would not be classified as a recall or field action in another. In addition, review cycles within the regulatory process can be different in each country which can impact communication and recall timing.
  • Source
    NZMMDSA